Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nikala Scholtz vs Patrick Foley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Scholtz vs Foley analysis and find out who is favored!
Nikala Scholtz vs Patrick Foley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Scholtz 1 - 0 Foley
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Scholtz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Foley has won 41.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Scholtz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Foley has won 48.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Scholtz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Foley has saved 53.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Scholtz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Foley winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Scholtz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 213/ 104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Foley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 44/ 66), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Scholtz winning 1 times and Foley being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Scholtz winning 2 and Foley winning 0. The last match between Scholtz and Foley was at the South Africa F3 (Stellenbosch), 05-12-2018, First, Hard with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Scholtz and Foley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Scholtz winning 0 times and Foley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Scholtz winning 0, and Foley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Scholtz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Foley has played against players with an average rank of 27.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Scholtz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Foley has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Scholtz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Foley has converted 32.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
320
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
65% (217-119)
Career Total W/L
34% (53-103)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (5-9)
$4,340
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nikala Scholtz | Patrick Foley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) | 49% (28/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (29/35) | 71% (20/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (24/57) | 24% (12/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nikala Scholtz | Patrick Foley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (12/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (128/137) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 49.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (298/417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (176/298) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (49/119) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 32% (9/28) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 32% (126/393) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Nikala Scholtz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maciej Smola
Player
Nikala Scholtz
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Joshua Luck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
54 of
66)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jean Thirouin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Nikala Scholtz
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Nikala Scholtz
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Foley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Patrick Foley
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Patrick Foley
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Summers
Player
Patrick Foley
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Scholtz Vs Foley Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
